Is MMLU-Pro still meaningful?
Status:Saturated Checked against the report, 5 November 2026
Verdict
No. Top scores sit near 90%, and no 2026 frontier results come from a primary source.
Why saturated: The chapter rates MMLU-Pro Saturated: the best score we found is 89.8%, and no primary source gives 2026 frontier scores.[1][1] MMLU-Pro Artificial Analysis Primary
What “Saturated” meansKnown problems
- No 2026 frontier scores come from a primary source.[1][1] MMLU-Pro Artificial Analysis Primary
What to look at instead
GPQA Diamond and then HLE replaced it in the knowledge line.[2][2] Humanity's Last Exam site Primary
- GPQA Diamond Status:Near ceiling Barely. Top models sit within one point of the 97% ceiling, inside the noise.
- Humanity's Last Exam (HLE) Status:Flawed Use with care. Nearly half of a sampled set was defective, so top scores partly reflect broken items.
- HLE-Diamond Status:New / unproven Promising but unproven. It launched in September 2026 and has no independent audit yet.
Where it appears in the report
Chapter 1, Benchmarks
- Table 3. How each area replaced its saturated benchmarks, oldest first in “Go deeper: Lineage of replacements, by area”
- Table 5. Reasoning and knowledge benchmarks: what they measure, who maintains them, the top score on 5 November 2026 and the known flaw in “Go deeper: Reasoning and knowledge benchmarks (17)”
Sources
Copied from the chapter source lists. Each number links back to the source in its chapter.
- [1] MMLU-Pro, Artificial Analysis. It lists MMLU-Pro scores without a date. Primary artificialanalysis.ai Chapter 1, source 31
- [2] Humanity's Last Exam site. It describes HLE, HLE-Rolling and HLE-Diamond. Primary lastexam.ai Chapter 1, source 23