Skip to content

Benchmark checker Chinese and Asian

Is ForesightSafety Bench still meaningful?

New / unproven Checked against the report, 5 November 2026

Too early to say, because it is new and the report found no published model results.

Why new / unproven: The chapter labels it New. Version 4 appeared in February 2026.^{[1][1] ForesightSafety Bench, arXiv 2602.14135 Primary}

What “New / unproven” means

Known problems

None of nine Chinese flagship cards checked on 5 November 2026 contains a safety evaluation section.^{[2][2] AIGL summary of Concordia AI's 2026 report Secondary}
Chinese labs send safety evidence to the private regulator filing instead of public cards.^{[2][2] AIGL summary of Concordia AI's 2026 report Secondary}

What to look at instead

The report names no direct successor.

Where it appears in the report

Chapter 6, China and Asia

Table 2. First-generation Chinese benchmarks in “Go deeper: First-generation Chinese benchmarks (2023–2026)”

Sources

Copied from the chapter source lists. Each number links back to the source in its chapter.

[1]
ForesightSafety Bench, arXiv 2602.14135. It describes a frontier-risk safety evaluation framework. Primary arxiv.org Chapter 6, source 25
[2]
AIGL summary of Concordia AI's 2026 report. It summarises the state of AI safety in China in 2026. Secondary aigl.blog Chapter 6, source 3