Is HLAB-Vals 1.1 still meaningful?
Status:Still useful Checked against the report, 5 November 2026
Verdict
Yes. All-pass scoring is strict, so models still spread out.
Why still useful: The chapter lists it as active, and the best all-pass score is 27.08% (4 Nov 2026).[1][1] HLAB-Vals-1.1 Vals AI Primary
What “Still useful” meansKnown problems
- It is private, so outsiders cannot check the items.[1][1] HLAB-Vals-1.1 Vals AI Primary
- Criterion pass rates sit near 96%, so all-or-nothing scoring hides near-misses.[1][1] HLAB-Vals-1.1 Vals AI Primary
- Vals AI uses a subject-pays model. Its CEO compares it to "a student paying to take the SAT".[2][2] Vals AI profile Carly Secondary
What to look at instead
The report names no direct successor.
Where it appears in the report
Chapter 1, Benchmarks
- Figure 7. The same model gets very different scores in different harnesses
- Figure 12. Agents get most rules right and most whole cases wrong
- Table 9. Legal skill benchmarks, November 2026 in “Go deeper: Legal skill benchmarks (10)”
Chapter 4, Market and companies
- Leaderboards became businesses, and every business model carries a conflict of interest
- Figure 12. Only the Buyer-Paid Benchmark Avoids Both Conflicts
- Table 16. Business models and their conflicts in full in “Go deeper: Leaderboard companies, conflict table and more detail”
Sources
Copied from the chapter source lists. Each number links back to the source in its chapter.
- [1] HLAB-Vals-1.1, Vals AI. It ranks models on Harvey's remediated 120-task private holdout. Primary vals.ai Chapter 1, source 74
- [2] Vals AI profile, Carly. It quotes the Vals CEO on who pays for tests. Secondary usecarly.com Chapter 4, source 120