Benchmark checker Safety and security

Is Cybench still meaningful?

Status:Saturated Checked against the report, 5 November 2026

Verdict

No. It went from 50% to 90% in five months, and Anthropic now calls it saturated.

Why saturated: Claude Opus 4.6 scored 93% unguided (Feb 2026), and Anthropic now calls Cybench saturated.[1][1] Benchmark data bundle Epoch AI Primary[2][2] Claude Mythos Preview system card Anthropic Vendor

What “Saturated” means

Known problems

  • Claude Mythos Preview solved all 35 challenges of a subset in every trial (vendor).[2][2] Claude Mythos Preview system card Anthropic Vendor
  • It climbed from 50% to 90% in five months.[1][1] Benchmark data bundle Epoch AI Primary

What to look at instead

  • ExploitBench Status:Near ceiling Fading fast. A vendor reports a perfect score, though Epoch AI rates the test Verified.

Where it appears in the report

Chapter 1, Benchmarks

Chapter 5, Institutions and regulation

Sources

Copied from the chapter source lists. Each number links back to the source in its chapter.

  1. [1]
    Benchmark data bundle, Epoch AI. Dated scores (5 Nov 2026) and ceilings for most benchmarks here. Primary epoch.ai Chapter 1, source 1
  2. [2]
    Claude Mythos Preview system card, Anthropic. It reports test suspicion, white-box awareness and Cybench results. Vendor anthropic.com Chapter 1, source 144
  3. [3]
    Cybench, arXiv 2408.08926. It tests models on professional CTF tasks. Primary arxiv.org Chapter 1, source 143